|



Home

Previous Articles
Advertising

Events
Links
Publications

About BDM News
Contact Us
|

Do You Have an Integrated Revenue
Capture Business Model or Are Just You Just Scaring Prospects Away?
by Paul DiModica, Editor, BDM News
- Are your sales costs increasing per sale?
- Does your marketing scare prospects away?
- Do you have products or services that no one is buying?
If so, then you may have a decentralized revenue capture approach
where your strategy, marketing and sales process are not aligned
as an integrated revenue capture program.
In my previous life, before starting this company and others,
I was VP of Strategy Worldwide for an $800 million public company
called Renaissance Worldwide. This was the company that bought
Renaissance Solutions, the consulting company owned by David P.
Norton, author of The Balanced Scorecard.
As VP of Strategy, I worked for the CEO and the board of directors
to evaluate and make appropriate recommendations on the strategy,
marketing and sales process of ten (10) operating business units
we had. Our operating units included internet start-ups, acquired
businesses, and organically grown divisions.
Using the balanced scorecard approach, I identified that many
of our business units had a decentralized revenue capture process
because their departments were not linked to a common goal or aligned
symbiotically to each other. Not that the management teams were
consciously trying to build barriers of cooperation between departments,
but it occurred due to their individual corporate goals, compensation
plans and the team members inability to understand the other department’s
functional operational attributes.
This lack of functional operational interdepartmental knowledge
and lack of alignment forced departments, even with good intentions,
to work as business silos.
Most Important
Benefit of Close
Integration of Sales and Marketing
according to Marketing-Related
Companies in the UK, 2007
(% of respondents)
| Ability to track leads |
23% |
| Quality of leads |
19% |
| Better ROI for marketing campaigns |
18% |
Source:
FrontRange Solutions, February 2007; New Blaze, February
2007
Provided to Paul DiModica by eMarketer.com under contract. |
Four Truths Many People
Ignore
- Corporate Strategy is based on research of what prospects
will buy, not what you want to sell.
Just because you bought a company, created a new offering, or
spent $10 million on development to create the greatest widget
in the world, it does not mean you have a market for what you
sell.
Buyers only care about themselves.
- The marketing department ’s primary goal is to
help generate qualified leads for sales . . . that’s
it.
Yes branding, third-party analysis research and beautiful tradeshow
booths are important, but they are just tools to ultimately increase
revenue.
Marketing must have ROI or it is a wasted investment.
- The sales department must sell new business.
Yes, selling existing customers is important, but to grow top
line revenue where you will not be dependant on your existing
customer’s ability to buy . . . you need to hunt for new
business as a premeditated approach. By focusing on the lifetime
value of deals, you can reduce sales capture costs.
Hunt Now or Be Eaten Later!
- If your departments are not aligned together by goals,
key performance indicators (KPI’s), compensation plans
and parallel knowledge of the operational tasks of the other
departments, then you have a decentralized revenue capture
process.
Revenue capture is a company responsibility . . . not the sales
departments.
Lead Generation Method Used
by Companies Worldwide, 2006
(% of respondents)
| Self-generated by sales reps |
42.0% |
| Marketing campaigns |
17.1% |
| Customer referrals |
15.2% |
| Telemarketing efforts |
11.0% |
| Generated by partners |
10.3% |
| Other |
4.6% |
Note:
Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding
Source: CSO Insights With CRMGuru.com, Selling Power and Sales
and Marketing Executive International (SMEI), February 2006
Provided to Paul DiModica by eMarketer.com under contract. |
Take The Revenue Capture
Scorecard Alignment Test
Here is a quick assessment of a much larger assessment test we
give to help you decide if your team is focused on revenue capture
as an integrated group or if are they operating as independent
silos.
- Does your company create (or acquire) new products or services
based on market demand?
__Yes __No
- Does your sales team have separate sales quotas for business
from existing customers and business from new prospects?
__Yes __No
- Is your marketing department paid based on the number and the
quality of their leads they generate?
__Yes __No
- Are your sales quotas or targets calculated based on mathematical
demand models?
__Yes __No
- Do your senior marketing executive and your senior sales executive
have a team metric then need to reach together?
__Yes __No
- Are your marketing managers paid based on corporate department
sales increases?
__Yes __No
- As a business to business company (B2B), does the marketing
department report to the VP of Sales?
__Yes __No
- Do the sales, marketing and strategy departments meet at least
four times a year to discuss successes and failures to date and
document action steps required by each?
__Yes __No
- Does your senior management team assign specific measurable
metrics to the strategy, sales and the marketing department managers
and is their performance discussed at executive meetings?
__Yes __No
- Are your sales team members evaluated on how quickly they follow-up
on sales leads given to them by the marketing department?
__Yes __No
- Does your marketing department go on sales calls at least twice
a year to understand the sales process?
__Yes __No
- Has your marketing team researched why prospects buy, why they
don’t buy, and how your firm creates value?
__Yes __No
- Do you have a written corporate strategy for all department
heads to review as needed as a corporate guideline?
__Yes __No
- Does the sales team have a written step-by-step sales process
to guide the marketing department on what communication deceives
they need create for each sales cycle step?
__Yes __No
Scorecard Answers
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
|
4. Yes
5. Yes
6. Yes
|
7. Yes
8. Yes
9. Yes
|
10. Yes
11. Yes
12. Yes
|
13. Yes
14. Yes |
Biggest Sales Challenges
according to US Marketers, 2005
(% of respondents)
| Sales follow-up with prospects and customers
is difficult to track |
24.3% |
| Lead generation is getting more expensive and payback is
getting worse |
22.3% |
| Rigid buying processes at most companies are delaying decisions
further |
18.4% |
| Getting existing customers to buy more products and services |
16.5% |
| Not enough quality leads for the sales force to call on |
12.6% |
| Techniques for getting sales appointments are getting less
effective |
5.8% |
Note:
Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding
Source: Three Deep Marketing with support from MarketingSherpa,
January 2006
Provided to Paul DiModica by eMarketer.com under contract. |
Biggest Marketing Business Challenges
according to US Marketers, 2005
(% of respondents)
| Knowing that there is a payback for marketing
dollars spent |
34.0% |
| Generating predictable lead flow for sales |
22.3% |
| Differentiating our company from competitors |
21.4% |
| Getting marketing communications out consistently |
14.6% |
| Qualifying lead status before hand-off |
7.8% |
Note:
Numbers do not add up to 100% due to rounding
Source: Three Deep Marketing with support from MarketingSherpa,
January 2006
Provided to Paul DiModica by eMarketer.com under contract. |
Leadership should be more
participative than directive, more enabling than performing.
Mary D. Poole
Other Articles
|
|